Sign up for the View from Westminster email for expert analysis straight to your inbox Get our free View from Westminster email Get our free View from Westminster email Email * SIGN UP I would like to be emailed about offers, events and updates from The Independent. Read our Privacy notice
Sir Keir Starmer’s plans to review how human rights laws are applied to asylum seekers in Britain have sparked strong reactions, with many Independent readers accusing him of becoming “Reform-lite.”
Critics argued that the prime minister, historically a staunch defender of the European Convention on Human Rights, now risks weakening protections for those fleeing torture or seeking to stay with their families.
Many warned that even minor changes could set a dangerous precedent, potentially undermining rights that everyone in Britain depends on.
Others, however, viewed the review as a practical response to rising migration, particularly record Channel crossings, and suggested it could clarify how courts interpret Articles 3 and 8 – covering “cruel and inhumane treatment” in an asylum seeker’s home country and the “right to a family life” – without removing protections entirely.
A minority of reader
Continue Reading on The Independent
This preview shows approximately 15% of the article. Read the full story on the publisher's website to support quality journalism.