In July, the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California ordered federal agents operating in Los Angeles to stop detaining people based on those factors, concluding that the plaintiffs in the case were “likely to succeed in proving that the federal government is indeed conducting roving patrols without reasonable suspicion and denying access to lawyers,” in violation of the Fourth and Fifth Amendments t
Continue Reading on New York Times
This preview shows approximately 15% of the article. Read the full story on the publisher's website to support quality journalism.