A flawed foundation can never produce a strong system — whether in science, engineering, governance, or IT. Faulty datasets always yield unreliable results, and electoral roll revision is no exception; broken base data cannot generate integrity, no matter how many procedures are added. Only a modern, accurate foundation can sustain a credible electoral system.
This is precisely the problem with the ongoing Special Intensive Revision (SIR), which relies on the legacy rolls of 2002 to 2004 which were created entirely on paper through manual, error-prone processes when India was entering its digital era. It is astonishing that the Election Commission of India (EC) still relies on these outdated records today, despite India being an IT powerhouse and the Commission itself operating one of the world’s most advanced electoral systems, ECINet.
This regression has erased decades of digital progress, forcing SIR 2.0 to operate on outdated methods and unreliable, unverifiable data. An exercise meant to produce clean and updated voter rolls has instead pushed the country into a prolonged crisis lasting months.
A glimpse at the legacy rolls
The past SIRs functioned mainly as routine summary revisions, focusing on deletions such as removing
Continue Reading on The Hindu
This preview shows approximately 15% of the article. Read the full story on the publisher's website to support quality journalism.