8 reasons the government should not introduce oral nicotine pouches to NZ

By Janet Hoek of Photo: stock.adobe.com It is now clear the government has failed to meet New Zealand's smokefree goal of fewer than 5 percent of people from all population groups smoking by the end of this year. According to the latest New Zealand Health survey, 6.8 percent of adults smoked daily this year, which is similar to the previous year (6.9 percent) and 2022-23 (6.8 percent). Tobacco remains widely available and large inequities in smoking prevalence continue, with smoking among Māori at 15 percent. Meanwhile, vaping is widespread among young people, with the latest New Zealand Health Survey estimating that 13.6 percent of young people aged 15 to 17 now vape daily. This estimate increased from 10.3 percent in 2024 and represents around 27,000 people who are below the legal age for vape sales but now addicted to vaping. Yet tobacco and nicotine companies want to introduce oral nicotine pouches, claiming these are a "cleaner way to enjoy nicotine". But their flavours, packaging and marketing appeal to young people and such a move risks exposing more youth to nicotine addiction and compounding the problems caused by vaping. How pouches work Oral nicotine pouches are small sachets containing nicotine extracted from tobacco or synthetic nicotine. People place a pouch under their upper lip and receive a potent dose of nicotine through their gums, without inhaling either smoke from burned tobacco or aerosol from vaping products. In 2024, Associate Health Minister Casey Costello acted on the National-NZ First coalition agreement and obtained approval in principle from Cabinet to introduce these products. Photo: RNZ / Samuel Rillstone We have several concerns. First, Ministry of Health officials advised there was no evidence to support oral nicotine pouches as smoking cessation aids. An expert group convened by the ministry reinforced this view and recommended a moratorium on introducing new nicotine products "until there is clear, independent evidence that [these] are safer than smoking and effective in helping people who smoke to stop smoking". A recent systematic review aligned with this conclusion, noting there is no evidence oral nicotine pouches help people stop using tobacco or vaping products, or that they reduce smoking or vaping prevalence. Even tobacco companies state their products do not aim to help people stop smoking. The Philip Morris website says: "Our smoke-free products are not designed as cessation aids." Second, the risks of oral nicotine pouches are not yet known. While they are not inhaled, pouches may affect oral, cardiovascular and mental health. A recent study noted tissue changes that may indicate increased risk of mouth cancers. Third, oral nicotine pouches are highly addictive. Nicotine affects brain development, particularly in adolescents and young adults, altering neural pathways associated with learning, attention and impulse control. Although marketed as the next reduced-harm alternative, experts warn that oral nicotine products may embed nicotine dependence among a large proportion of young people. Fourth, nicotine addiction is not benign; it imposes lifelong financial, physical, social and emotional costs. Introducing a new consumer product whose primary function is maintaining addiction is not public health progress. Fifth, international evidence shows oral nicotine pouches are designed to appeal to young people. They use sweet, fruity and alcoholic flavours; their packaging is eye-catching and uses colours likely to appeal to young people. Pouches look more like chewing gum or mints than a product that could lead to life-long addiction. Influencers promote pouches as lifestyle enhancers that boost energy, help concentration and ease social encounters. In our view, this is not cessation messaging but addiction marketing. We already face major challenges helping young people to stop vaping. Approving another youth-friendly, easily concealed addicting product would, in our view, be reckless. New nicotine products won't solve the problem Sixth, oral nicotine pouches are virtually invisible when used. They have no smoke, no aerosol clouds, no tell-tale smell. Because they are extremely difficult to monitor, they will be easy to use in schools. Seventh, the logic of introducing pouches is flawed. Many will know the story of the old lady who swallowed a fly, followed in quick succession by a spider, bird, cat, dog, cow and horse; the story did not end well. The government introduced vaping products to help people stop smoking. They are now proposing to introduce nicotine pouches to help people stop smoking and vaping. Photo: AFP/ Hans Lucas Legalising more nicotine products is not a targeted solution to solving the problem of smoking, particularly given evidence shows uptake of novel products is greatest in young adults, most of whom do not smoke. However, the most compelling argument is the risk these products pose to the Tupeka Kore...

8 reasons the government should not introduce oral nicotine pouches to NZ

Continue Reading on RNZ

How do you feel about this article?

📝 Article Information

Author

Original Publisher

Published Date

Disclaimer

8 reasons the government should not introduce oral nicotine pouches to NZ

Continue Reading on RNZ

How do you feel about this article?

📝 Article Information

Author

Original Publisher

Published Date

Disclaimer

More from RNZ