Australia vs NZ: Who's doing retirement income better?

Photo: RNZ / REECE BAKER Do New Zealanders or Australians get a better deal in retirement? Commentators say it depends who you're asking. A number of people who contact RNZ with questions about their financial lives want to know about NZ Super if they've been in Australia or [https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/business/579686/we-re-in-australia-can-we-come-back-and-get-nz-super-ask-susan their entitlements to a pension in Australia if they've been living here. But how do the two systems compare? Superannuation savings Australians probably get a better deal out of their superannuation savings than New Zealanders do from KiwiSaver. From July last year, the contribution rate has been set at 12 percent - and this is contributed by the employer. Contributions are generally taxed at 15 percent but tax is charged on withdrawals when they are made from income before tax was paid on it such as contributions from an employer or salary sacrifice. Listen to No Stupid Questions with Susan Edmunds In New Zealand, our current default rate of 6 percent is split between the employer and employee. It comes from taxed income and returns made by the fund are taxed. Withdrawals are not taxed. Tim Jenkins, superannuation consulting leader at Mercer, said the contributions were a key difference. "In Australia, no one needs to pay a contribution… if you're an employee, it's 12 percent regardless of whether you pay or not." The compulsory nature of the scheme meant that anyone who was employed was developing savings for retirement, whereas in New Zealand people could opt out of the scheme, or stop contributing. He said it was notable that New Zealand had next to no tax concession for savings. "In Australia there are substantial tax concessions particularly for the higher end of town and that makes a big difference on incentives and what people choose to do." Jenkins said another difference was that Australian superannuation schemes had life insurance built in, whereas in New Zealand people have to arrange and pay for this cover separately People can also access their superannuation in Australia when they are 60 if they have left work. In New Zealand, access is tied to the age of eligibility for NZ Super. "That's quite important because you have a number of people who cannot continue working to 65 because of the physical jobs, or whatever is going on, or they're unemployed," Jenkins said. "This helps with that transition to retirement phase." New Zealand's pension costs about 5.1 percent of GDP, roughly twice what Australia's costs. It is projected to rise to 8 percent by 2065, compared to a projected drop to 2 percent for Australia by 2060. Pension But it's on the pension that New Zealand comes into its own. In Australia, you need to be 67 to qualify. To receive the full pension amount, you can only earn up to $218 a fortnight as a single person, or $380 as a couple. The cut-off point for a single person to receive anything is $2575.40 a fortnight, and for a couple it is $3934. A single homeowner also cannot have assets more than $321,500 to receive a full pension. In New Zealand, NZ Super is available to anyone over 65 who meets the residency requirement, with no income or means testing. To generate the amount that a single person gets in NZ Super, you'd need to have about $600,000 saved, at a drawdown rate of 4 percent a year. At the moment, the average balance of Australians nearing retirement is about A$400,000. Jenkins said Australian super was replacing the pension for middle Australia, whereas all residents and citizens in New Zealand could access it. Simplicity chief economist Shamubeel Eaqub said, from an individual perspective, New Zealand had a really good system. "Everybody just gets free cash… Who would say no to free cash? The problem, of course, is that the overall pension system doesn't make sense. "It's literally free money. Essentially working New Zealanders are subsidising the superannuation system. It's working as we designed it to and it's doing exactly what we thought it would. The question is, is it fair?" The cost of the current system was projected to keep rising in an unsustainable way, he said. "If you look at the Treasury long-term briefing, there's a really nice chart of New Zealand versus Australia, comparing the total superannuation cost including the subsidies for their savings scheme. "Ours goes up forever, and theirs gradually trends down over the next several decades. That's the difference. We have it good for now but it's not going to last. "They have it good for those who need it but not so much for those who don't. They have a system that encourages people to save out of their income … it's really around collective versus individual. I think the lens really matters but also generational, so for people who are getting it now this current system in New Zealand is fantastic and it's absolutely terrible for the young people of New Zealand." Pie Funds chief executive...

Australia vs NZ: Who's doing retirement income better?

Continue Reading on RNZ

How do you feel about this article?

📝 Article Information

Author

Original Publisher

Published Date

Disclaimer

Australia vs NZ: Who's doing retirement income better?

Continue Reading on RNZ

How do you feel about this article?

📝 Article Information

Author

Original Publisher

Published Date

Disclaimer

More from RNZ