Unfortunately, a look back at recent U.S. interventions in the Middle East, including several that I was personally involved in as a diplomat, suggest that the answers to these questions are not encouraging.
Ongoing calls for U.S. intervention in Iran reflect the triumph of hope over history. With the Trump administration reportedly still weighing an attack on the Iranian regime, now is the moment to ask what the goals of an intervention would be, whether they are achievable, and what risks they carry.
Ongoing calls for U.S. intervention in Iran reflect the triumph of hope over history. With the Trump administration reportedly still weighing an attack on the Iranian regime, now is the moment to ask what the goals of an intervention would be, whether they are achievable, and what risks they carry.
Unfortunately, a look back at recent U.S. interventions in the Middle East, including several that I was personally involved in as a diplomat, suggest that the answers to these questions are not encouraging.
American outrage at the brutality of the Iranian government is reasonable and proper. But this doesn’t mean that hitting Iran militarily will facilitate a peaceful political transition with no negative consequences. Moreover, President Donald Trump’s policies toward Venezuela remind us that he is not interested in supporting democracy globally.
Continue Reading on Foreign Policy
This preview shows approximately 15% of the article. Read the full story on the publisher's website to support quality journalism.