Scott Watson loses bid to quash convictions as court rules he had a 'fair trial'

Photo: Pool / John Kirk-Anderson The Court of Appeal has turned down a bid to quash Scott Watson's convictions for the murders of Olivia Hope and Ben Smart. Watson's lawyer, Kerry Cook said Watson was "very disappointed" with the decision. "He maintains that he is innocent. He has instructed us to prepare an application for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court."' Watson - who has spent a quarter of a century in prison for the murders of Smart and Hope - had his case heard by the Court of Appeal last June. The Blenheim friends, aged 21 and 17, were last seen stepping off a water taxi onto a stranger's yacht in the Marlborough Sounds in the early hours of 1 January, 1998, after a New Year's Eve party at Furneaux Lodge. Their bodies have never been found. The appeal focused on the use of photo montages shown to witnesses ahead of the original trial, and the reliability of forensic testing used to show two hairs found on Watson's boat belonged to Hope. A nearly 300-page decision released on Wednesday by Justices Christine French, Patricia Courtney and Susan Thomas, found there was no miscarriage of justice in relation to the hair evidence or the identification of Watson by water taxi skipper Guy Wallace. "Considering the case overall, the court is satisfied Watson's trial was fair and the jury's guilty verdicts followed the crown presenting a compelling case. "Watson's murder convictions must stand." 'We'll just keep plodding on' Scott Watson's father, Chris Watson said he felt let down by the decision. "I talked to Scott this morning, he's disappointed as you'd expect, but life goes on, or what life he has. "We're pretty used to the kick in the stomach that you get when you get this news, we thought we had it and it boils down to three people's opinions." He said he felt a bit jaded after the last 25 years, but would continue the fight to prove Watson was innocent. "We'll just keep plodding on." A long awaited appeal Watson was found guilty of the murders at a jury trial in the High Court in 1999. The key issue at the trial was whether Watson was the lone man with whom Hope and Smart boarded a boat the last time they were seen. It was now accepted that the pair died at the hands of the lone man in circumstances which amounted to murder. In the absence of a murder weapon or any bodies, the original case relied on circumstantial evidence - including two blonde hairs that were found to belong to Hope and were recovered from Watson's boat Blade, and that Watson was picked out as the lone man by Wallace from a photographic montage. Watson appealed his convictions to the Court of Appeal in 2000 and it was dismissed. He then applied to the Privy Council for special leave to appeal, which was declined in late 2003. An application for the exercise of the royal prerogative of mercy, a special avenue for criminal cases to be reopened where a person may have been wrongly convicted, was declined in 2013. Watson made a second application for a royal pardon in November 2017, and in 2020, the governor-general referred the question of his convictions to the Court of Appeal to determine whether a miscarriage of justice had occurred The focus of the five-day hearing, held last June, was to consider new evidence about the hair belonging to Hope and the reliability of Wallace's identification of Watson. Watson has been denied parole five times since he became eligible eight years ago - partly because he has refused to admit his guilt. Hair evidence and photo identification In the appeal, Watson relied on new expert opinion challenging the reliability of the forensic evidence at trial about the two hairs found on a tiger-patterned blanket aboard Blade. The court considered the collection and handling of the hairs, the reliability of the results obtained from the DNA testing and the fairness and accuracy of the evidence given about those tests at trial. It found there was no issue with the reliability of the hair evidence, and that it was extremely unlikely they had become mixed up in the lab with those taken from Hope's home or transferred to Blade through other means. The appeal also considered whether a photo montage used by police had predisposed witnesses to pick out Watson. At the original trial, the Crown's case relied completely on the positive identification of Watson by water taxi driver Wallace, who dropped off the young pair to a stranger's yacht in the early hours. That positive identification was critically important to the Crown case, as the Court of Appeal had confirmed in 2000 and again in 2022. Photo: NZ Police After initially describing a completely different man and failing to pick Watson out of a montage of photos, Wallace was shown a single picture of Watson. Three months later, after being shown a series of photos known as 'montage B', Wallace picked out Watson as the man he had seen. Wallace - who took his own life in 2021 - recanted soon after, saying he was pressured...

Scott Watson loses bid to quash convictions as court rules he had a 'fair trial'

Continue Reading on RNZ

How do you feel about this article?

📝 Article Information

Author

Original Publisher

Published Date

Disclaimer

Scott Watson loses bid to quash convictions as court rules he had a 'fair trial'

Continue Reading on RNZ

How do you feel about this article?

📝 Article Information

Author

Original Publisher

Published Date

Disclaimer

More from RNZ