When constitutional entitlements become grievances

. The writer is a former Secretary to Government, Home & Tribal Affairs Department and a retired IG. He can be reached at aashah77@yahoo.com The letter written by Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa Chief Minister Sohail Afridi to Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif is not merely an exchange of official correspondence over delayed fiscal transfers. It is a stark reminder of the widening gap between constitutional promises and fiscal practice in Pakistan's federal system. When constitutionally guaranteed rights begin to resemble discretionary favours, the consequences extend well beyond balance sheets, affecting governance capacity, social stability and national cohesion. Federalism under the Constitution of Pakistan is anchored in predictability, equity and mutual trust between the federation and the provinces. The National Finance Commission (NFC) Award is the principal instrument through which this trust is operationalised. It is neither a political concession nor an administrative courtesy; it is a binding constitutional arrangement designed to ensure that provinces possess the financial capacity to discharge their responsibilities. Persistent deviations from this framework weaken not only provincial governance but also the credibility of the federation itself. As highlighted in the CM's letter, K-P's budget for FY25-26 was framed strictly on the basis of constitutional entitlements - routine monthly NFC transfers, net hydel profit, oil and gas royalties and post-merger allocations for the newly merged districts (NMDs). These were not speculative assumptions or political gambits; they were binding fiscal obligations. Yet, actual releases have consistently fallen short, resulting in a reported shortfall of over Rs54 billion under the NFC alone. This shortfall is not an accounting anomaly. It represents a material breach that has impaired cash management, disrupted budget execution and constrained service delivery in key sectors such as health, education, policing and social protection. Of even greater concern is the withholding or irregular release of routine monthly NFC transfers - a practice that finds no sanction in the Constitution and strikes at the core of cooperative federalism. When constitutionally mandated transfers become unpredictable, provinces are left to shoulder responsibilities without the means to fulfil them. The consequences of this fiscal stress are most visible in the NMDs. Despite a provincial allocation of approximately Rs292 billion, federal releases reportedly amount to only Rs56 billion. This yawning gap undermines development, stabilisation and state consolidation. The merger was intended to correct decades of neglect; chronic underfunding risks turning a historic constitutional reform into a prolonged exercise in frustration. At the heart of this debate lies K-P's demand for a larger share from the divisible pool - a demand that is constitutionally justified rather than politically motivated. The province has proposed a share in the range of 19 to 19.64 per cent, reflecting the significant increase in population following the merger of the former FATA, the accumulated development deficit in the merged districts, enduring security and reconstruction costs, and the economic damage suffered by industry and cross-border trade. Crucially, this demand draws legitimacy from Article 160 of the Constitution, which requires NFC allocations to be determined not solely on population but also on need, backwardness and equity. With the merger, K-P's population has multiplied substantially, warranting a revised population-based share of approximately 19.4 per cent - a share that continues to be denied. On this account alone, the province should have received an additional Rs600 billion since the merger. Based on a divisible pool estimated at Rs7.24 trillion, an enhanced share would yield roughly an additional Rs0.29 trillion annually, enabling meaningful investment in education, healthcare, infrastructure, and economic revival in historically neglected regions. However, the absence of full financial integration of the merged districts has left development there proceeding at a snail's pace. These fiscal constraints are unfolding at a time when K-P continues to bear extraordinary national burdens. The province remains on the frontline of counterterrorism efforts, absorbing the financial and administrative costs of maintaining internal security. It has also endured repeated natural disasters, requiring large-scale rehabilitation and reconstruction. Additionally, the management and support of temporarily displaced persons impose expenditures that are national in character but disproportionately borne by the province. Political sociology and conflict studies offer sobering lessons in this context. Research has consistently established that grievances, if left unaddressed, generate a sense of deprivation. Over time, deprivation evolves into resentment, and resentment, if reinforced through repeated...

When constitutional entitlements become grievances

Continue Reading on The Express Tribune

How do you feel about this article?

📝 Article Information

Author

Original Publisher

Published Date

Disclaimer

When constitutional entitlements become grievances

Continue Reading on The Express Tribune

How do you feel about this article?

📝 Article Information

Author

Original Publisher

Published Date

Disclaimer

More from The Express Tribune