Over the past couple of months, several researchers have begun making the same provocative claim: They used generative-AI tools to solve a previously unanswered math problem.

The most extreme promisesβ€”AI-assisted resolutions to some of the hardest problems in mathematicsβ€”may well turn out to be empty hype. But a number of AI-written solutions, albeit to far less lauded problems, have checked out. These were answers to a number of the ErdΕ‘s Problemsβ€”more than 1,000 mathematical questions set forth by the Hungarian mathematician Paul ErdΕ‘sβ€”written with generative-AI models including ChatGPT. OpenAI quickly claimed a victory: β€œGPT-5.2 Pro for solving another open ErdΕ‘s problem,” OpenAI President Greg Brockman posted on X in January. β€œGoing to be a wild year for mathematical and scientific advancement!” (OpenAI and The Atlantic have a corporate partnership.)

Much of the excitement around the news has stemmed from the adjudicator of these AI-written proofs: Terence Tao, a professor at UCLA who is widely considered to be the world’s greatest living mathematician. His stamp of approval seemingly legitimizes the greatest promise of generative AIβ€”to push the frontier of human knowledge and civilization.

πŸ“°

Continue Reading on The Atlantic

This preview shows approximately 15% of the article. Read the full story on the publisher's website to support quality journalism.

Read Full Article β†’