The International Monetary Fund (IMF) reports sit at the intersection of economic analysis and historical memory. The institution’s legacy of “conditionality,” particularly in the Global South, continues to shape a cautious distance today. Yet its technical capacity, extensive data resources and ability to provide global comparisons make it equally difficult to dismiss these reports outright.
In Türkiye, debates surrounding IMF assessments are often filtered through political lenses. However, an international institution’s analysis of a country’s economic outlook is neither a prophecy to be revered nor an external voice to be ignored. What truly matters is understanding the assumptions that shape the data, the economic models underpinning the recommendations and the extent to which the report captures Türkiye’s unique structural dynamics. In economics, confidence, expectations and international perception are as real as inflation figures, yet the methodology behind every report deserves just as much scrutiny as the numbers themselves.
For this reason, approaching the IMF’s assessment of Türkiye requires neither sanctification nor categorical rejection.
Continue Reading on Daily Sabah
This preview shows approximately 15% of the article. Read the full story on the publisher's website to support quality journalism.