LONDON - It was neither logical nor functional for the Islamic resistance movement of Lebanon to continue remaining silent in the face of the comprehensive violations and arrogance of the Israeli occupation entity. Not taking action while enduring daily losses, killings, the burning of villages, and violations on land, sea, and air becomes humiliating.

This had been declared repeatedly by Secretary General Sheikh Naim Qassem in his speeches: β€œthings cannot remain like this indefinitely.”

The issue concerns the usefulness of resistance actions in the balance of profit and loss, and their impact on the enemy’s calculations, as well as the costs and prices the enemy would have to bear.

During the phase of silence over the past 14 months, the equation was as follows: the benefit of remaining silent, allowing space for reconstruction, was greater than the benefit of responding, which could lead to war.

πŸ“°

Continue Reading on Tehran Times

This preview shows approximately 15% of the article. Read the full story on the publisher's website to support quality journalism.

Read Full Article β†’