The 3 AI Problem: How Chinese, European, and American Chatbots Reflect Diverging Worldviews

A test of the ideological biases of three leading AI models from China, Europe, and the U.S. returned some surprising results.

Recent studies have shown that some of today’s most widely used large language models (LLMs) echo the values of Western, Educated, Industrialized, Rich, and Democratic (WEIRD) societies. A 2024 paper demonstrated that GPT’s answers to the World Values Survey cluster with those of English-speaking protestant societies, emphasizing self-expression values such as LGBTQ+ rights, environmental protection, and individual autonomy. In contrast, GPT diverged from opinions common in countries such as the Philippines or Nigeria, suggesting a heavy imprint of Western-educated users.

This raises an important question: Do Chinese AIs carry a different worldview?

China is a non-WEIRD country and its LLMs have advanced rapidly: models like DeepSeek and QWen now reach global audiences. Their spread has geopolitical implications, especially given China’s approach to information governance. Upon release, DeepSeek drew attention for avoiding references to the Tiananmen protests, a reminder of Chinese censorship norms. Researchers later confirmed that DeepSeek delivered highly official-sounding answers when sensitive geopolitical topics were raised, sometimes phrased in a style resembling Chinese government statements. These patterns were especially visible in Mandarin and on politically charged questions such as protest participation.

Nevertheless, other analyses found an unexpecte